mRNA jabs, Genetically Modified Foods, Fluoride are Still Hoaxes

In the recently concluded April Edition of the Global Fasting and Prayer, and the Global Service with God’s Prophet to the Nations, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD., he emphasised the categorical and inherent problems with mRNA jabs, genetically modified foods (especially corn), and fluoride poisoning. Not only are these issues he has outlined on global platforms with specific focus at a time, but there is a recent emphasis that we ought not to miss and even appreciate for what it means in the present hour – which is precisely what we ought to discuss today.

mRNA JABS ARE A PROVEN BIOLOGICAL WEAPON AND WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION

In June 2024, a Dr Francis Boyle, a Harvard-trained professor and the architect of the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was unanimously approved by both Houses of the US Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush; he has issued an affidavit declaring COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction! Dr. Boyle’s affidavit, which was submitted as part of an emergency petition for a writ of mandamus in Florida, argues that the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines violates several statutes, including the US Code on Biological Weapons and Florida’s statutes on weapons and firearms.

Now, the contribution from Dr Boyle’s affidavit is significant because the case had actually been previously dismissed. More specifically, the original Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed on March 3rd, 2024, in the Florida Supreme Court. It was later transferred to the Circuit Court in Leon County on March 20th, 2024. After the Circuit Court dismissed the case on April 9th, 2024, it moved to the appellate court. The Appellate Brief was filed late last month on May 27th. Therefore, Dr Boyle, as one of the world’s leading legal experts on biological weapons, has added considerable weight to the case with his affidavit. However, this is not to say that the case itself lacked substance; in fact, the case already boasts a substantial body of evidence provided in the writ of mandamus, including affidavits from medical legal advisor and biotech analyst Karen Kingston and Ana Mihalcea. And from the contents of the case, the pleadings claim that the distribution of these injections violates several laws, including: (1) Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175; (2) Federal Crime of Treason 18 USC § 2381; and (3) Treason § 876.32 Fla. Stat. – just to name a few.

So, what then are the consequences of COVID mRNA jabs being pronounced to be biological weapons of mass destruction? First, it means that the COVID propagators were engaged in biological warfare with the people on the earth because this pronouncement connotes that there was an intentional release of living pathogens with the intention either to kill or incapacitate individuals, or even to render certain areas impassable to unprotected persons. Secondly, it means that the propagators of the COVID debacle committed the biggest crime against humanity, and thankfully, there is evidence of this. However, what is worth engaging in light of the COVID jabs being a biological weapon of mass destruction is the fact that the coronavirus has a long history of being modified for various reasons, including as a biological weapon in 1966!

And while the coronavirus was being modified to function as a biological weapon, pharmaceutical companies conveniently saw an opportunity to patent vaccines fitted for the modifications of the time. However, in 1990, the same pharmaceutical companies discovered something interesting about vaccines – the fact that they do not work; and yet recently, COVID jabs were hailed as a panacea to the coronavirus!

So, if the pharmaceutical companies knew that vaccines did not work particularly on the coronavirus, which itself was modified to function as a bioweapon, well, it then tells us that the pharmaceutical companies ALSO launched a biological war on people through vaccines that they falsely marketed as a panacea, when in fact they had no remedial impact. [PAUSE] But, here’s more evidence that the coronavirus, historically, was always intended to be a biological weapon.

Ultimately, the evidence that twas presented in this meeting, which was the International Covid Summit hosted by the European Parliament, suggests that Covid-19 was intentionally released by the US government in Wuhan, China with the goal to trigger a global pandemic to raise public acceptance of US Pharma vaccines. In fact, more proof of this is even concerning the biological impact that the mRNA vaccines have on the human body. Once again, the propagators of the COVID debacle clearly committed the biggest crime against humanity.

So what does this discussion mean for the present hour? First, it means we are past the point of contending whether the coronavirus and the mRNA jabs were a war on health. There clearly is an abundance of, first, divine revelations that show this to us, but also corresponding scientific evidence that corroborates these revelations, AND also medical and legal principles that prove causality (when it comes to the harms from the mRNA jabs). Second, this tells us that we are moving beyond mere desires for accountability for the propagators of the COVID debacle – because we are now at the point where the legal parameters and scope of accountability is being defined.

THE MULTIFACETED ISSUES RESULTING FROM GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN

Which then brings us to the second part of our discussion, looking at another of the recently emphasised admonishments from the President of Loveworld Inc., being genetically modified corn. First, corn was among the first crops to be genetically modified. The first genetically modified corn, known as Bt corn, was released in 1996. It was engineered to produce an insecticide, killing corn borers and other pests, reducing the need for chemical pesticides. More specifically, this type of corn is genetically engineered to produce a protein from the bacterium Bacillus thurin-gien-sis (or Bt), which is toxic to certain insects. And while the Flavr Savr tomato was the first commercially released genetically modified crop, Bt corn was an early example of a GM crop being used for pest resistance. In the present Bt corn is a major component of the US corn crop, with a significant percentage of it being genetically modified.

Now, despite it being hailed as a success – especially in killing pests, this corn is a massive liability for human and animal health. In fact, corn was once a beautiful, natural plant. But today, much of the corn you find in the supermarket is genetically modified. That means its DNA has been altered in a lab, often to survive being sprayed with toxic chemicals like glyphosate. So, what does this mean for the present hour? Well, it means, you ought to ask yourself—if the plant can survive poison, what is that doing to your body when you eat it? The answer? It presents you with numerous health threats, as a result of the toxins. For instance, people who consume a lot of corn today are said to largely suffer from hypertension. Secondly, genetically modified corn is also directly tied to something called leaky gut syndrome.

IN 2001, ‘EPICYTE’ CREATED CORN THAT KILLS THE THE MALE REPRODUCTIVE SEED

It does not stop there. In September 2001, Scientists created what they called contraceptive corn, with the pretext or (quote unquote) saving the world from overpopulation. These pregnancy prevention plants were the handiwork of the San Diego-based biotechnology company ‘Epicyte’, where researchers discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack the male reproductive seed, or sperm. By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company essentially created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives, towards a depopulation agenda!

Well, guess who then purchased the Epicyte firm, and further commercialised the epicyte gene?

If you follow one of our programmes here on LN24 International, called ‘Starting Point’ you would have caught detailed exposes on DuPont and Monsanto as diabolical corporations who have instigated a war on health through food and chemical compounds – which then provides a contextual background for why they feature in this discussion on the epicyte gene as well.

But, thankfully, governments are beginning to wake up to the realities of how detrimental genetically modified corn is; and are also taking bold actions against GMO corn. For instance, Mexico Officially Banned the Planting of GMO Corn! More specifically, Mexico’s lower house of Congress approved a constitutional reform to ban the planting of genetically modified (GM) corn, a move that could lead to more tension with the United States after the resolution of a trade dispute, analysts said. The initiative by President Claudia Sheinbaum comes after a trade-dispute panel ruled in December that Mexico’s restrictions on GM corn, mostly imported from the United States, violate the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

The USMCA trade dispute ruling against Mexico’s right to not import GM corn for human consumption was wrong and unfair. Especially when the science shows the harms that GM corn can cause. That evidence was presented but completely ignored by the trade dispute panel. But, the government of Mexico proceeded to protect its people and a staple ingredient in their diet from the GMO corn agenda, through this official ban which was officiated in the month of March this year.

FLUORIDE AS A SIGNIFICANT CAUSE OF MANY INFIRMITIES

So, we have discussed here on ‘The War Room’, how fluoride had its origins in the production of atomic bombs. In essence, fluoride has a little-known role in The Manhattan Project, where scientists actually needed both uranium AND fluoride to build the bomb; in particular fluoride was used to enrich the uranium in order to build the bombs. To explain why this is jarring and utterly diabolical, I’d have to paint a picture of the first atomic bomb that came from the manhattan project. This would be the uranium bomb that detonated over Hiroshima, in Japan, on the 6th of August 1945; and it had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of TNT. It razed and burnt around 70 percent of all buildings in the city and caused over 140,000 deaths by the end of 1945, along with increased rates of cancer and chronic disease among the survivors.

Then, fluoride toxicology studies from the research during the Manhattan Project research, which often took the form of experiments performed on unknowing human subjects, were actually covered up. This is in part why when we talk about the atomic bomb (even years after the information about the Manhattan Project became public), we often speak of uranium, and not so much the role of fluoride. But, in addition to that, for years, scientists lied about their results, while government policy blocked publications. HOWEVER, it was clear that the Public Health Service approached this research data not as something to inform the public with, but something that was potentially detrimental to their promotion of water fluoridation. Think about it: if you knew that one of the most destructive weapons ever made contained fluoride, you would not want it in your water, or milk, or cookware. And so, the so-called public health officials keep this crucial fact from the public.

THE COMMON DENOMINATOR: GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS AND FLUORIDE ARE CARCINOGENS

Now, in the last few decades, an abundance of medical research has emerged that shows much more profound dangers, from both genetically modified foods (which were giving test rats large tumours); and also from fluoride – establishing  common denominator between GMOs and fluoride as carcinogens. In the case of fluoride, this has also led to an ongoing legal battle to end the practice of fluoridation. Fluoride is essentially toxic to the human body. While human kidneys are able to filter out 50-60% of the fluoride a person consumes, the rest is stored in the body and has been observed to build up over time in certain areas. One organ that is particularly susceptible to fluoride build-up is the pineal gland — the part of our brain responsible for regulating sleep AND reproductive hormones. But, it does not stop here, because fluoride is also a carcinogen, meaning that it is a cancer causing agent.

Others claim that there is an acceptable level of fluoride that prevents such ramifications. But, as we;ve previously discussed, the classification of fluoride as a pollutant rather than as a nutrient or medicine is a useful starting point for analysing the adverse effect of fluoride. No fluoride deficiency disease has ever been documented for humans. Indeed, the basis for setting an “adequate intake” of fluoride rests on the alleged ability of ingested fluoride to prevent tooth decay. However, since it is now known that the effect of fluoride is topical, the notion of an “adequate daily intake” is flawed. In fact, one of the key concerns about water fluoridation is the inability to control an individual’s dose of ingested fluoride which brings into question the concept of the “optimal dose.” Since the 1980s numerous studies have identified that adults and children are exceeding these agreed limits, contributing to a rapid rise in dental fluorosis—which is the first sign of fluoride toxicity.

This to say that the inability to control individual dose renders the notion of an “optimum concentration” obsolete. In the USA, a study in Iowa found that 90% of 3-month-olds consumed over their recommended upper limits, with some babies ingesting over 6 mg of fluoride daily, above what the Environmental Protection Agency and the WHO say is safe to avoid crippling skeletal fluorosis. Another study in the UK of fluoride levels found in tea concluded that “… fluoride concentrations can exceed the recommended DRI of 4 mg/day…, in certain tea commodities, under the minimal brewing time of 2 min…”. This study used non-fluoridated water but supports earlier findings by a researchers known as Koblar (and company) who report that the adequate intake of fluoride from a 70 kg adult consuming five cups of tea daily ranges from 25 to 210% depending upon tea brand and whether the water is fluoridated. But, here is Retired National Toxicology Program (NTP) Director, Linda Birnbaum, discusses why she believes water fluoridation is outdated due to emerging evidence of the risk of developmental neurotoxicity and a demonstrable lack of efficacy.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso