The Collapse of the Transgender Deception

I am convinced that transgenderism is one of the biggest psyops in this generation, because how could it not be? At its core is blatant disregard for undeniable facts about biology while simultaneously guilting or tricking some women to give up women-only spaces and privileges (that they often fought to have) to biological men pretending to be women. On top of this, it appears that even those who claim to be transgender are constantly confronted with the psychological issues of the so-called transition: we see this with how transgender persons are often suspects in mass shootings, how depressed the medicine makes them, or how overwhelming the regret of the surgeries can be. But, in the Year of Completeness, where satanic and globalist agendas are under suspension, we are seeing a protruding trend in the collapse of the transgender deception.

THE ARGUMENT FOR WHY TRANSGENDERISM IS A PSYOP

Now, Laura Aboli once said something quite profound: she said that persuading an intelligent species like humanity to consent to its own obliteration demands significant physical and mental torment. As such, the majority of events over the past 60 years have been engineered to propel humanity toward embracing this nightmarish vision. And she’s right: humanity has been trapped in a rigorously orchestrated simulation where its collective view of the world is deliberately shaped, controlled, and directed to manipulate people toward whatever path serves the interests of those with globalist aspirations—and that path is intended to lead to a world beyond humanity. 

To achieve this, the initial step involved undermining, depersonalising, and dispiriting people via every conceivable method: from breaking down traditional family structures, to government-led brainwashing of youth, normalising abortion, banishing faith in schools, confining life to sprawling urban areas disconnected from the natural world, polluting the human diet, atmosphere, and water supplies, supplanting genuine relationships with digital platforms, and promoting ethical ambiguity as the prevailing doctrine.

And so, through these avenues, society has been steered away from elements that foster resilience, stability, direction, and fulfillment. And the problem with this is that a frail, unethical, isolated, uninformed, and ailing society becomes prime for the subsequent phase: which is engineering a cohort of gender-neutral entities. Male traits are being assaulted on mental, societal, and physiological fronts. Meanwhile, females are being displaced in athletics, media, and governance by males posing as females. At the same time, schools are teaching kids that sex is optional – which tells us that the push for transgenderism is NOT organic; it is rather imposed from those driving an anti-life agenda. It bears no real relation to individual liberties, sexual orientations, or equal protections. Instead, it’s a malicious psychological operation aimed at advancing the goal of divorcing people from basic reality, such that any notion that is introduced to society can be defended as relative fact.

Think about it: people who are told that gender is a social construct, will not have a hard time believing that transhumanism is a necessary progression for humanity, because they are taught to think that biological facts can be augmented or transcended. Similarly, these individuals will defend inherent contradictions, like how women should be protected from violence but how transgender women (who are biological men) can somehow be allowed into biological women’s bathrooms or changing rooms. None of this makes sense, except a person is programmed through social nudging and curated messaging to think that it is normal. ANd this is why, transgenderism (in addition to being a very satanic and deceptive phenomenon) is certainly a psyop: it is a psychological operation conducted on society, in an effort to divorce from basic reality. 

GENDER DYSPHORIA IS NOT A BIOLOGICAL REALITY; PUBERTY IS NOT AN ILLNESS 

Additional proof of transgenderism being a psychological operation is the very annoying pretence of there being an experience of gender dysphoria, almost as if to imply that puberty ban be some sort of illness. The notion of gender dysphoria is nothing more than social contagion. In particular, psychological distress and aberrant behaviours are always conceptualised through the lens of culture, and in any society at any given time we create medical and psychological narratives to best understand aspects of human behaviour based on these prevailing norms. These then go on to shape further behaviours. This is known as the ‘symptom pool’.

For instance, anorexia was almost unknown in Hong Kong until a public awareness campaign was launched by Western psychiatrists in the 1990s. Within a few years there was a 2,500% increase in cases. Girls diagnosed with anorexia were treated sympathetically, they were taken out of school and given positive reinforcement for their illness. Unsurprisingly, more girls began restricting their eating, thus causing a growing feedback loop of youngsters developing anorexia. The awareness campaign in Hong Kong had in effect created and spread a novel mental illness (and its behavioural sequalae) into a population of receptive and suggestible adolescents. Similarly, in the 2000s, Japan saw a surge in the incidence of depression after GlaxoSmithKline released the antidepressant Paxil into the local market.

But, currently the West is in the grip of an unprecedented medical scandal arising from a relatively new entrant to the symptom pool, namely Gender Dysphoria. And the addition of Gender Dysphoria to the symptom pool is fed by the concept of gender identity, which is an UNPROVABLE, metaphysical belief that we all have an innate sense of our ‘gender’. That our gender exists outside of our physical bodies (or biological sex). Which then means that gender dysphoria occurs when one’s gender identity does not match one’s sexed body. Then following from a diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria is the idea of ‘gender affirming care’. This involves the highly unethical and entirely experimental use of synthetic cross-sex hormones and the surgical mutilation of physically healthy bodies in order to align with one’s supposed gender identity.

HOWEVER, Gender Dysphoria itself is not real.  It has no clinical or evidentiary basis. It is a false construct, created ex nihilo (or out of nothing) and this construct was first published in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders ( also called the DSM) 5th edition in October 2013. But, there are no standardised tests to accurately measure gender dysphoria, and the clinical features of Gender Dysphoria are not arrived at by the scientific method: i.e. formal testing, formulation, intervention, evaluation, and if necessary, reformulation. AND SO, Gender Dysphoria is in reality a long con! It is treated as a valid construct only because it appears in the DSM. Meanwhile, the DSM itself is merely a trade manual for the American Psychiatric Association. It is a revenue-producing commercial publication, like a magazine that advertises products. And while we’re on the DSM, how are people not concerned that Gender Dysphoria is the ONLY clinical symptom in the DSM-5 whose treatment involves (or even requires) surgical intervention! No one is treating autism or depression by mutilation because that would be a serious medical concern and likely a violation of the duty not to cause harm, and yet it’s allowed by gender dysphoria?!

But, ultimately, because it has no clinical basis, Gender Dysphoria is in reality whatever a client (usually a child) says it is. Children are coached online often by adult men into believing that they are transgender. Gender Dysphoria is literally the only psychological construct wherein the client essentially diagnoses themselves and also determines their own severity – it is utterly deceptive; inherently contradictory, and dangerous. And so, realising all of this, let it not be lost on us that gender dysphoria is a construct, and that puberty is not an illness – mental or otherwise.

THE COMMON DENOMINATOR WITH MOST ALLEGED “TRANS” CHILDREN IS MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES

Now, while we know that there is no scientific study that supports gender dysphoria, doctors, teachers and activists in support of the gender agenda make the claim that children can tell from an early age when they have been “mis–genderred”. They go a step further to say that it is oppressive and discriminatory not to allow them to dress or act in the manner that they identify – so much so, that in other western countries like Canada and states like California in the US, there has been a call to criminalise parents who refuse to support so-called trans children in one way or the other.

Some direct rebuttal. First, and (once again), there is no scientific evidence to support an experience of gender dysphoria, therefore what they claim to be intuitive knowledge from a child when they claim to be “mis-gendered” can not be regarded as an objective fact. Secondly, as we have established in previous discussions, there is a general consensus that children are not regarded as fully mature beings who are capable of complete expression or legal consent. The reason for this is that children, in all that they progressively learn, do not always fully appreciate the complex concepts (which is why complex concepts are simplified and taught at their level of understanding). Children are also not fully able to appreciate the consequences of actions, even when they are taught those actions are wrong or right (which is why we do not allow children to make complex decisions, especially irreversible ones). So, generally, we have this understanding in society, it’s part of the reason why five year olds do not vote in national elections, or why children do not have legal standing to represent themselves in court, or even why parents/legal guardians generally determine health decisions for their children.

But now, the gender agenda both undermines the vulnerability of children by overstating their ability to understand complex concepts on sexuality and even the ability of children to give informed consent. Subsequently, it takes advantage of the impressionable nature and vulnerability of children and even young adults. I say this because there is often a specific demographic of children who tend to become victims of the trans agenda, and it is children often suffering from mental health issues or experiencing discomfort during puberty changes. They are then prescribed chemical or surgical castration, because it is simply a quick fix to what is really an unrelated mental health issue. Some of them have come out to testify of the often undiscussed harms they suffer.

POLITICISED MEDICINE MANIPULATED MENTAL HEALTH CONCERNS FOR THEIR AGENDA

From this just seen documentary excerpt alone, we can infer that the common denominator in the cases we just heard was mental health issues. These people were in need of help that addressed the root cause of their issues, and not a counter-narrative that suggested something completely unrelated. But the reason why transgenderism was presented to them as an option is because – despite all the talk of gender ideology activists on how there are more than two genders and how gender is not binary, IRONICALLY, trans and gender ideology activists will provide to the children they target a so-called solution that is inherently binary; because they state that if you are not happy as a girl, then it must be because you are a boy or vise versa. Ultimately, these so-called activists and the medical practitioners that they co-opted lied to children to tell them they would become better. In fact, at the detransitioner day discussion, one of the detransitioners shared her story and in her message to the medical professionals who transitioned her as a minor, she very aptly asked: “Why didn’t you protect me?”

The detransitioner we just listened to also captured something critical about the children who experience traumatic events and mental health issues who become susceptible to false and diabolical trans ideology. She said no one wants to be a traumatised child. This is incredibly true. Which brings me to another aspect of how politicised medicine manipulated the mental health and traumatic histories of children for the gender agenda. This has to do with the fact that politicised medicine completely ignores how children respond to traumatic and stressful events or development.

More specifically, any respectable medical practitioner, teacher, social worker or child psychiatrist will tell you that children process trauma through a variety of emotional, behavioral, and physical reactions, which can include increased anxiety, difficulty regulating emotions, sleep disturbances, and changes in behavior or routines. They might also struggle to understand or articulate their feelings, leading to outbursts or withdrawal. They might become irritable, withdrawn, or experience a loss of interest in activities they once enjoyed. It may even appear in curious physical manifestations like stomachaches, headaches, or other genuinely unexplained physical symptoms.

Now, instead of recognising these manifestations as potential expressions of discomfort, a traumatic experience, or even mental health issues, politicised medicine will instead (almost always) re-characterise these symptoms as being symbolic of gender dysphoria. And there is context for this aggravating leap in logic, because it was the same thing that (the unacceptably renowned psychologist) Sigmund Freud did when he discovered, years ago, that those who were exhibiting abnormal behaviour who had been entrusted to his care, had actually all been sexually abused when they were younger. He presented his findings to the society at the time, and when they threatened his career, he then presented a counter-narrative for why the children were exhibiting abnormal behaviour, as opposed to addressing the root cause.

Finally, politicised medicine also manipulates mental health concerns by threatening the suicide of children who are not permitted to “transiiton”. Once again, I do not necessarily blame parents for falling for this claim; because when a parent is told that their child is at risk of ending their life, that easily seems like the worst case scenario and thus has the potential to dilute the parent’s concerns about child mutilation, if they do not understand the full extent of the harms that child mutilation also brings. And so, parental concern (that is particularly fueled by fear mongering) will likely move parents to want to save their children (at least as they are coerced to) – especially if they do not fully understand what the transition would mean for their children.

But, when we engage de-transitioners, who are now speaking out against allowing minors to make choices that have an irreversible impact on them, these children and young adults are advocating hard against allowing minors to make such decisions because they are now dealing with the consequences of having been allowed to make decisions with permanent ramifications on the basis of temporary feelings. What is also interesting to note, is that children who opted for child mutilation, were actually coerced themselves into transitioning because even they were told they would end their lives if they did not transition (like we saw in the documentary excerpt earlier on)!

Therefore, it appears that the threat of suicide originates from the medical practitioners who perform these surgeries of distribute the puberty blockers! SECONDLY, and this is especially for parents) if children are not being told that THEY will end their lives if they do not opt for mutilation, they are often already struggling with mental health issues, like depression. Therefore, even in this instance, as a parent, it is worth considering that you would not be risking the life of your children by refusing to opt for child mutilation – because the depression or other mental health issues seems to generally exist independent of the option for mutilation or “transitioning”. Therefore, there is a greater urgency to solve those issues through addressing their root cause, as opposed to adhering to the counter-narrative that claims that is a child is depressed or suicidal, it is because they are transgender and need to be allowed to “transition”.

And I believe Yarden Silveira’s story is among the most tragic cases of detransition that serve as a warning. His scathing Yelp reviews of the surgeons who harmed him briefly surfaced on social media last year, but his full story remained elusive. But, in essence, as a vulnerable autistic teenager, Yarden was encouraged by healthcare providers to medically transition. After suffering severe, life-threatening complications from a botched vaginoplasty—and after more than a dozen so-called “gender-affirming” doctors refused to treat his surgeon-inflicted injuries—he is believed to have ended his life at just 23. His preventable death was NOT because his parents refused for him to transition; his death is because he DID transition and suffered the ramifications that came with it. [PAUSE] This is of course a very difficult thing to discuss, and my hope is not merely to use Yarden’s case to conclude a point; rather it is to highlight that the trans agenda is a diabolical agenda that – at its core – is about the destruction of lives; it is a tool used to wage a war on health and the innocence of children, and it therefore must categorically be treated as such, so that there are not many cases like that of Yarden.

And , thankfully, people are getting increasingly aware of this agenda and its tactics to manipulate vulnerable children and even undermine parental rights; which actually brings us to a testimony of a de-transitioner that we once discussed in a different context – her name being Chloe Cole – and she highlights that her parents, who did not fully understand th world of transgenderism, were threatened with her alleged suicide, thus coercing them into a diffuct choice.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso